[Bug target/64237] [5 Regression] glibc build failure

2014-12-09 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64237 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |MOVED --- Comment #13 from Markus

[Bug target/64237] [5 Regression] glibc build failure

2014-12-09 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64237 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED URL|

[Bug target/64237] [5 Regression] glibc build failure

2014-12-09 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64237 --- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #9) > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8) > > > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #7) > > > > > Ad

[Bug target/64237] [5 Regression] glibc build failure

2014-12-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64237 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #9) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8) > > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #7) > > > > Adding -fuse-ld=gold to the crtn.o link command posted above,

[Bug target/64237] [5 Regression] glibc build failure

2014-12-09 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64237 --- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #7) > > > Adding -fuse-ld=gold to the crtn.o link command posted above, also fixes > > > the > > > issue. > > > >

[Bug target/64237] [5 Regression] glibc build failure

2014-12-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64237 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #7) > > Adding -fuse-ld=gold to the crtn.o link command posted above, also fixes the > > issue. > > It should read: "nscd link command" Do you use the same ld to buil

[Bug target/64237] [5 Regression] glibc build failure

2014-12-09 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64237 --- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- > Adding -fuse-ld=gold to the crtn.o link command posted above, also fixes the > issue. It should read: "nscd link command"

[Bug target/64237] [5 Regression] glibc build failure

2014-12-09 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64237 --- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #4) > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3) > > > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #0) > > > > trippe

[Bug target/64237] [5 Regression] glibc build failure

2014-12-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64237 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #4) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3) > > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #0) > > > trippels@gcc20 nscd % cat nscd.i > > > extern int program_invoca

[Bug target/64237] [5 Regression] glibc build failure

2014-12-09 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64237 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #0) > > trippels@gcc20 nscd % cat nscd.i > > extern int program_invocation_name; > > extern void fn2(int, int); > >

[Bug target/64237] [5 Regression] glibc build failure

2014-12-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64237 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #0) > trippels@gcc20 nscd % cat nscd.i > extern int program_invocation_name; > extern void fn2(int, int); > void > fn1() { fn2(0, program_invocation_name); } > > tripp

[Bug target/64237] [5 Regression] glibc build failure

2014-12-09 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64237 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Started with r218397. HJ, it looks like this is now the intended behavior. Original error: /home/trippels/gcc_test/usr/local/bin/gcc -pie -Wl,-O1 -nostdlib -nostartfiles -o /home/trippels/glibc_build/

[Bug target/64237] [5 Regression] glibc build failure

2014-12-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64237 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-* Priority