[Bug target/26427] Regressions with -fsection-anchors with zero sized structs

2006-05-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 02:27 --- *** Bug 27683 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/26427] Regressions with -fsection-anchors with zero sized structs

2006-03-02 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-02 19:44 --- I said: > I'm considering adding equivalent code to varasm.c. This will fix > an inconsistency in the handling of zero-sized decls: sometimes > they get a byte of storage allocated to them (giving them a unique >

[Bug target/26427] Regressions with -fsection-anchors with zero sized structs

2006-02-23 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 09:01 --- In keeping with your choice of "target" category, I think this is a Darwin-specific thing. ASM_DECLARE_OBJECT_NAME() in config/darwin.h says: /* Darwin doesn't support zero-size objects, so give them a

[Bug target/26427] Regressions with -fsection-anchors with zero sized structs

2006-02-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-22 19:00 --- This causes a lot of the gfortran testsuite to fail. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26427