------- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-02 19:44 ------- I said:
> I'm considering adding equivalent code to varasm.c. This will fix > an inconsistency in the handling of zero-sized decls: sometimes > they get a byte of storage allocated to them (giving them a unique > address) and sometimes they don't. I'm no longer sure that's a good idea. I suspect some users of zero-sized structs really do want them to take zero size in the object, and know which incantation they need to get that. I'll have to leave the darwin.h ASM_DECLARE_OBJECT_NAME() issue to someone with access to Darwin. Richard -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26427
