--- Comment #10 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-11 16:14 ---
Fixed.
--
ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #9 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-11 15:36 ---
Subject: Bug 26149
Author: ghazi
Date: Tue Mar 11 15:35:51 2008
New Revision: 133114
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133114
Log:
PR target/26149
Backport:
2007-03-18 Ur
--- Comment #8 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-11 01:23 ---
Patch posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-03/msg00663.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26149
--
ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #7 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-03-09 20:55 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Uros - It would seem that the first patch written by you and installed on
> 3/22/2008 was sufficient to fix the problem on x86_64. What was the need for
> the others, relevant towards this PR?
--- Comment #6 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-09 19:40 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> IIRC, this is a testsuite issue, -march=i486 is not appended automatically to
> compile flags. This was fixed by following patch series:
> [...]
Uros - It would seem that the first patch wri
--- Comment #5 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-03-09 16:17 ---
IIRC, this is a testsuite issue, -march=i486 is not appended automatically to
compile flags. This was fixed by following patch series:
2007-04-07 John David Anglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR testsuite/31369
--- Comment #4 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-09 16:07 ---
On 4.3.x, this failure goes away sometime on 20070322. Luckily we had two
testsuite results on the same day hours apart from one person in which the
failure disappears. :-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-
