------- Comment #7 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-03-09 20:55 ------- (In reply to comment #6)
> Uros - It would seem that the first patch written by you and installed on > 3/22/2008 was sufficient to fix the problem on x86_64. What was the need for > the others, relevant towards this PR? IIRC, various !x86 targets need their little tweaks, i.e. where they put their dynamic libraries. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26149
