[Bug target/18617] missed volatile variable optimizations

2010-01-29 Thread eric dot weddington at atmel dot com
--- Comment #4 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2010-01-29 17:50 --- Closing as WONTFIX. -- eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/18617] missed volatile variable optimizations

2009-02-08 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-08 14:13 --- This is a really old bug. Since 2005, a lot has happened in GCC. Could someone interested in AVR please check whether this is still an issue? -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Remove

[Bug target/18617] missed volatile variable optimizations

2005-06-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added GCC host triplet|ppc | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18617

[Bug target/18617] missed volatile variable optimizations

2005-01-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18617

[Bug target/18617] missed volatile variable optimizations

2004-11-23 Thread schlie at comcast dot net
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2004-11-23 13:49 --- Subject: Re: missed volatile variable optimizations Reviewing the rtl dump of the code, it does appear that SI mode volatile and nonvolatile variables are being initialized similarly (through an intermediate),

[Bug target/18617] missed volatile variable optimizations

2004-11-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-22 23:56 --- This is target problem. -- What|Removed |Added Component|c