--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2004-10-20 18:34 ---
Subject: Re: wrong code emitted
Hi Andrew,
Please correct the failure mode description to " critical, wrong code",
as upon reviewing the avr.md file, it's now clear that this isn't a
"missed optimization"; GCC
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2004-10-19 23:13 ---
Subject: Re: not using qi version of divmod
schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
>--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2004-10-19 22:31 ---
>Subject: Re: not using qi version of divmod
>
>
erands are clearly type compatible with unsigned char, and a valid
optimization.
-paul-
> From: ericw at evcohs dot com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 19 Oct 2004 22:08:15 -
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Bug t
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2004-10-19 22:08 ---
Bug #10733 is related.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericw
nks again,-paul-
> From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 19 Oct 2004 21:39:27 -
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Bug target/18065] not using qi version of divmod
>
>
> --- Additional Comm
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-19 21:39
---
I don't know but as I said this is correct code and not a wrong code problem but just
a missed
optimization somewhere.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
