------- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2004-10-19 22:31 ------- Subject: Re: not using qi version of divmod
Hi Eric, Out of curiosity, what exactly is the 10733 bug, is wrong result computed? If so, that implies that divmodhi is broken; otherwise it's not a bug, as the intermediate (t1 + 40) expression yields an int result, as within the context of the expression, although t1 is an unsigned char, there's no guarantee that (t1 + 40) will not overflow an unsigned char size, therefore properly assumed to be an int; unlike t1 = t1 % 3 or whatever, where all operands are clearly type compatible with unsigned char, and a valid optimization. -paul- > From: ericw at evcohs dot com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 19 Oct 2004 22:08:15 -0000 > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Bug target/18065] not using qi version of divmod > > > ------- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2004-10-19 22:08 > ------- > Bug #10733 is related. > > -- > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |ericw at evcohs dot com > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18065 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18065
