https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120841
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target|X86_64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120841
--- Comment #2 from rockeet ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Gcc is already better than llvm by figuring out the return of memcpy is the
> first argument.
>
> I am not sure if the one extra move is going hurt here either.
Yes,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120841
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Gcc is already better than llvm by figuring out the return of memcpy is the
first argument.
I am not sure if the one extra move is going hurt here either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120841
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
Severity|normal