https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120841
--- Comment #2 from rockeet <rockeet at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Gcc is already better than llvm by figuring out the return of memcpy is the > first argument. > > I am not sure if the one extra move is going hurt here either. Yes, gcc is better than clang for this case. I think gcc can be better if it is possible.
