https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c5ef4944e3858e7daf1ef75a3afa93a3ece37c5
commit r14-10385-g6c5ef4944e3858e7daf1ef75a3afa93a3ece37c5
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591
--- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
No objections at all. Go for it whenever it's convenient for you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ---
Thanks Jeff! Any objection to backporting the fix onto the 14 branch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8bc5561c43b195e1638e5acace8b41b3f7512be3
commit r15-1870-g8bc5561c43b195e1638e5acace8b41b3f7512be3
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Passed without issue. I'll go ahead and ACK the patch here. It's good to go
IMHO.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Just threw this into my tester. Figure ~90 minutes to get back the cross
> results.
Thanks!
> I assume that if we go forward that you'll handle putting together a
> regression test since it's Ada source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Eric,
Just threw this into my tester. Figure ~90 minutes to get back the cross
results.
I assume that if we go forward that you'll handle putting together a regression
test since it's Ada source?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
Jeff, this looks like an obvious fix given the comment just above the modified
code, but only a maintainer can probably assess that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591
--- Comment #4 from simon at pushface dot org ---
bug.adb compiles without error after applying the patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591
--- Comment #3 from simon at pushface dot org ---
On 23 Jun 2024, at 11:47, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591
>
> --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
> The immediate fix is:
>
> dif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
The immediate fix is:
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
index c17141d909a..5e34dc92210 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
@@ -1702,7 +170
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115591
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
13 matches
Mail list logo