http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51374
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51374
--- Comment #11 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-01
12:46:42 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Feb 1 12:46:39 2012
New Revision: 183798
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183798
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/51374
* gcc.target/av
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51374
--- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-01
12:40:26 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Feb 1 12:40:23 2012
New Revision: 183797
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183797
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline r183796
PR rt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51374
--- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-01
11:35:37 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Feb 1 11:35:34 2012
New Revision: 183796
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183796
Log:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/51374
* combine.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51374
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51374
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-01-13
15:58:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 26316
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26316
pr51374.diff (tentative patch against 4.7)
* combine.c (record_dead_and_set_regs_1): Update
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51374
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-12-18
19:01:56 UTC ---
In combine.c:try_combine, just after the "Trying..." dump output, there is:
i0 = 0
i1 = 0
i2 =
(set (reg/v:QI 43 [ status ])
(mem/v:QI (const_int 43 [0x2b])))
i3 =
(set (p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51374
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|4.7.0 |
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51374
--- Comment #4 from andyw at pobox dot com 2011-12-01 13:22:44 UTC ---
Compiler command line & -v output showing configure options (thought I had
pasted this in the initial report - apparently not.) Do not know what happened
to the attachment, the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51374
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-12-01
10:08:05 UTC ---
ALso notice, that with the following test case that reads status *after* data
typedef unsigned char uint8_t;
void __vector_18(void)
{
unsigned char data = (*(volatile uint8_t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51374
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25964|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51374
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
12 matches
Mail list logo