subject:"\[Bug rtl\-optimization\/119099\] \[15 regression\] Compile\-time hang in ext\-dce"

[Bug rtl-optimization/119099] [15 regression] Compile-time hang in ext-dce

2025-03-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119099 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aef04968cfba0feb4420d96c61f766ee6c73f957 commit r15-7874-gaef04968cfba0feb4420d96c61f766ee6c73f957 Author: Alexey Merzlyakov Date: T

[Bug rtl-optimization/119099] [15 regression] Compile-time hang in ext-dce

2025-03-06 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119099 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/119099] [15 regression] Compile-time hang in ext-dce

2025-03-06 Thread alexey.merzlyakov at samsung dot com via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119099 --- Comment #8 from Alexey Merzlyakov --- Oops... It looks like we've submitted the patch in maillist in parallel two times.

[Bug rtl-optimization/119099] [15 regression] Compile-time hang in ext-dce

2025-03-06 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119099 --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law --- No worries on the dual submission. If that's the biggest problem I have to deal with today, I'll consider it a good day.

[Bug rtl-optimization/119099] [15 regression] Compile-time hang in ext-dce

2025-03-06 Thread alexey.merzlyakov at samsung dot com via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119099 --- Comment #7 from Alexey Merzlyakov --- > That should result in the livein sets never contracting. That API will return > a boolean indicating if that livein set actually changed. Now I just have to > see if there's any fallout. Thanks for n

[Bug rtl-optimization/119099] [15 regression] Compile-time hang in ext-dce

2025-03-05 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119099 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Sorry my bad. Conflated bi-direction dataflow with the sets expanding/contracting. We don't do bi-directional dataflow in here. In this case it's the dataflow sets contracting and expanding and never con

[Bug rtl-optimization/119099] [15 regression] Compile-time hang in ext-dce

2025-03-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119099 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #3) > Bi-directional dataflow is notoriously hard to get correct and I have zero > confidence this code handles that reasonably. I thought I had some checks > for t