[Bug middle-end/20030] [4.0 Regression] Broken arguments access

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-18 14:37 --- Fixed. --- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-18 14:37 --- Subject: Bug 20030 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2

[Bug middle-end/20030] [4.0 Regression] Broken arguments access

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-18 14:37 --- Fixed. --- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-18 14:37 --- Subject: Bug 20030 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2

[Bug middle-end/20030] [4.0 Regression] Broken arguments access

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-18 14:32 --- Subject: Bug 20030 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-18 14:31:54 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog fold-const.c Log message:

[Bug middle-end/20030] [4.0 Regression] Broken arguments access

--- Additional Comments From sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2005-02-17 19:17 --- Tobi, thanks for adding me to the CC list. Andrew's patch fixes the problems with BLAS. I extemely happy someone else was able to find a small testcase, because I was starting to trim 10K

[Bug middle-end/20030] [4.0 Regression] Broken arguments access

--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-17 18:12 --- Adding Steve Kargl to CC, as this is most likely the BLAS bug he's been looking into. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/20030] [4.0 Regression] Broken arguments access

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-17 17:45 --- Patch here: . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/20030] [4.0 Regression] Broken arguments access

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-17 17:40 --- I have a fix which I am testing. Yes this was a bug in fold_indirect_ref and not in the fortran front-end (it could also effect Ada too but I have no test case for Ada). Basically what happens is that th

[Bug middle-end/20030] [4.0 Regression] Broken arguments access

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-17 17:25 --- This is a bug in fold_indirect_ref. We get now: D.485 = (*ca)[0]{lb: 1 sz: 1}; See how the lower bound is 1, that is wrong. A related C testcase is: typedef char a[1]; int f(a * b) { char a1 = *(char*

[Bug middle-end/20030] [4.0 Regression] Broken arguments access

-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Keywords|