------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-17 17:25 ------- This is a bug in fold_indirect_ref.
We get now: D.485 = (*ca)[0]{lb: 1 sz: 1}; See how the lower bound is 1, that is wrong. A related C testcase is: typedef char a[1]; int f(a * b) { char a1 = *(char*)(b); return a1; } But for C we don't have lower bounds. In fact in fortran we lower already all the array access so they start at 0. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-02-17 17:25:38 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030