https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89461
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89461
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 69331 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89461
--- Comment #9 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Tue Mar 12 23:13:36 2019
New Revision: 269628
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269628&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/89461
* testsuite/lib/libstdc++.exp: Lo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89461
--- Comment #8 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 45873
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45873&action=edit
Patch
This patch fixes the tests that need to link against libatomic on hppa.
We need to add path to libat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89461
--- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2019-02-27 4:24 a.m., redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Maybe libstdc++ should just link to libatomic unconditionally for your target.
Yes, I'm trying that in current build. The issue is certa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89461
--- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2019-02-27 4:19 a.m., fw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Is it really true that 64-bit PA-RISC lacks 64-bit atomics? That's … awkward.
PA-RISC only has two atomic instructions (ldcw and ldcd). T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89461
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Maybe libstdc++ should just link to libatomic unconditionally for your target.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89461
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89461
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2019-02-23 2:34 p.m., redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89461
>
> --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> Oops, that should be:
>
> --- a/libstdc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89461
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oops, that should be:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/experimental/io_context
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/experimental/io_context
@@ -134,7 +134,8 @@ inline namespace v1
io_context* _M_ctx;
};
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89461
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This might help, but probably isn't the right fix:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/experimental/io_context
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/experimental/io_context
@@ -134,7 +134,8 @@ inline namespace v1
io_co
11 matches
Mail list logo
