https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61617
--- Comment #4 from piotr5 at netscape dot net ---
thanks anyway. so what is the standards comitee's "direction" for making
arbitrary-width-tree iterators more comprehensible, if not an iteration over
multiple children for each level's node? does
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61617
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61617
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61617
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to piotr5 from comment #0)
> this has been suggested for addition in the next standard.
So have lots of other things, many of them contradictory.
We've got plenty of work that *is* in the standa
