https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61617
--- Comment #4 from piotr5 at netscape dot net --- thanks anyway. so what is the standards comitee's "direction" for making arbitrary-width-tree iterators more comprehensible, if not an iteration over multiple children for each level's node? does boost::coroutine contradict anything among gcc-commitee's plans? guess I'll ask that directly elsewhere and post my findings here, if you don't reply.
