--- Comment #7 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-18 17:58 ---
Fixed for 4.2.3.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-18 17:58 ---
Subject: Bug 33807
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Oct 18 17:58:13 2007
New Revision: 129454
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129454
Log:
2007-10-18 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libstd
--- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-18 17:48 ---
No, this is ADL at work. Browse the comments in stl_iterator.h for some
additional hints, or delve into the nuisances of ADL ;) Anyway, for mainline, I
will also add another fix, which avoid completely the comparison for st
--- Comment #4 from bldantes at comcast dot net 2007-10-18 16:40 ---
Why does adding the new libstdc++ template function:
template
inline bool operator!=(const allocator<_Tp>&, const allocator<_Tp>&);
fix the conflict between my template function:
template
bool operator != (const T&
--- Comment #3 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-18 16:29 ---
Thanks for fixing this Paolo.
-benjamin
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33807
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-18 10:00 ---
Subject: Bug 33807
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Oct 18 10:00:18 2007
New Revision: 129434
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129434
Log:
2007-10-18 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libstd
--- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-18 09:55 ---
Note, the problem - trivial, the same we had in stl_iterator.h - is latent in
the older branches, dates back to the configurable allocator.h. The fix is safe
and will go in 4_2-branch too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33807
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pcarlini at suse dot de
|dot org |
