[Bug libstdc++/24071] solaris vs. __gthread_active_p

2005-10-02 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-02 21:27 --- > Therefore, I'm suggesting I close this, and open a more general enhancement > bug. I'd rather keep it open and recategorize it as a "target" PR, since there is really a problem with __gthread_active_p on Solar

[Bug libstdc++/24071] solaris vs. __gthread_active_p

2005-10-02 Thread mark at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #8 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-10-02 21:21 --- Subject: Re: solaris vs. __gthread_active_p bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > However, there is a bigger issue involved, which is still in progress. > Actually, > I'd like to broaden this out a bit since it look

[Bug libstdc++/24071] solaris vs. __gthread_active_p

2005-10-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-01 19:41 --- (In reply to comment #6) > However, there is a bigger issue involved, which is still in progress. > Actually, > I'd like to broaden this out a bit since it looks like we are thinking of > solving a related

[Bug libstdc++/24071] solaris vs. __gthread_active_p

2005-10-01 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-01 18:50 --- Hey dudes. Mark, the original problem report, the fails, is fixed on mainline and on the gcc-4_0-branch. It looks like the fix for this, after all our effort, did not make it into 4.0.2. Whoops: mistakes hap

[Bug libstdc++/24071] solaris vs. __gthread_active_p

2005-10-01 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/24071] solaris vs. __gthread_active_p

2005-10-01 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-01 09:17 --- OK, I have unset the target milestone. Thanks, -- Mark -- What|Removed |Added Target Mi

[Bug libstdc++/24071] solaris vs. __gthread_active_p

2005-10-01 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-01 09:02 --- > I'm confused about the status of this bug. I believe it is fixed on the 4.0 > branch (originally for 4.0.2, but due to the release both, actually for > 4.0.3). > However, this bug is still marked as "

[Bug libstdc++/24071] solaris vs. __gthread_active_p

2005-10-01 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-01 08:53 --- I'm confused about the status of this bug. I believe it is fixed on the 4.0 branch (originally for 4.0.2, but due to the release both, actually for 4.0.3). However, this bug is still marked as "New". If

[Bug libstdc++/24071] solaris vs. __gthread_active_p

2005-09-27 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27 07:14 --- > Possible solutions: > > 1) force double initialization again. > 2) add dg-options "-pthread" for solaris on the given testsuite files > 3) link libstdc++ builds on solaris with -pthread. Libjava already

[Bug libstdc++/24071] solaris vs. __gthread_active_p

2005-09-26 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Attachment #9815|double intialization patch |force intialization patch description|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_b

[Bug libstdc++/24071] solaris vs. __gthread_active_p

2005-09-26 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-26 23:24 --- Created an attachment (id=9815) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9815&action=view) double intialization patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24071

[Bug libstdc++/24071] solaris vs. __gthread_active_p

2005-09-26 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at libertysurf dot ||fr http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s