------- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-01 18:50 -------
Hey dudes. Mark, the original problem report, the fails, is fixed on mainline and on the gcc-4_0-branch. It looks like the fix for this, after all our effort, did not make it into 4.0.2. Whoops: mistakes happen. I didn't consider this stop-ship then and certainly don't now, and think that the notes Eric made (use -pthreads if using __mt_allocator) are an acceptable workaround. However, there is a bigger issue involved, which is still in progress. Actually, I'd like to broaden this out a bit since it looks like we are thinking of solving a related issue on linux as well. (See RH bugzilla, link below) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165728 Therefore, I'm suggesting I close this, and open a more general enhancement bug. That might clarify the situation for everybody. -benjamin -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24071
