--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-06-29 12:08
---
Fixed for 4.1.0.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-29
11:49 ---
Subject: Bug 22131
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-29 11:48:54
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog
libstdc++-v3/inclu
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-06-24 18:22
---
Thanks Martin for the clarification: 100% agreed, also about the grammar thing.
I will fix that in a few days, as soon as I'm back from GCCSummit.
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From sebor at roguewave dot com 2005-06-24 17:11
---
Yes, sorry for being too terse. The value is supposed to be stored even if the
placement of the thousands separators is invalid, just as long as the input
sequence matches the grammar in 22.2.3.1, p2.
For examp
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-06-24 12:18
---
If I understand correctly Martin, the point is that, according to
22.2.2.1.2/11-12, even when the groups are invalid (indeed, he expects a fail
in the second assert) the value is stored in val anyway. If this is h
--- Additional Comments From chris at bubblescope dot net 2005-06-24 08:52
---
It's probably me being blind, but could you point out the part of the standard
which defines what should be happening?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22131
