------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-06-24 12:18 ------- If I understand correctly Martin, the point is that, according to 22.2.2.1.2/11-12, even when the groups are invalid (indeed, he expects a fail in the second assert) the value is stored in val anyway. If this is his point, I believe he is right, we have a bug, certainly not terribly difficult to fix ;)
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22131
