https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
--- Comment #18 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Patch submitted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-December/057198.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
--- Comment #17 from Roland Illig ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #16)
> I feel like the "array subscript has type char" error is really a red
> herring in this case.
I agree, especially for C programmers who are not aware
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
--- Comment #15 from Roland Illig ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #9)
> I'm still trying to understand how an
> option names -Werror=char-subscripts could trigger an
> error. There are no subscripts.
There _are_ subscripts, just look
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
--- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #13)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #12)
>
> > Any reason not to use the macros from safe-ctype.h?
>
> Can we actually use it? This is part of libibe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #12)
> Any reason not to use the macros from safe-ctype.h?
Can we actually use it? This is part of libiberty, AFAIK,
and I am not sure that we link libgfortran against it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
--- Comment #10 from Roland Illig ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #9)
> That could work. I'm still trying to understand how an
> option names -Werror=char-subscripts could trigger an
> error. There are no subscripts.
The C standard a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
--- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 04:10:50AM +, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
>
> Thomas Koenig changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 04:38:32AM +, roland.illig at gmx dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
>
> --- Comment #2 from Roland Illig ---
> >--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
--- Comment #2 from Roland Illig ---
>--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
>Why cast to unsigned char? The prototypes for tolower(), toupper(),
>isdigit(), etc show that the type of the argument is int.
See https://stackoverflow.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
20 matches
Mail list logo
