--- Comment #9 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-20 20:33 ---
Right you are. I'll just have to hope it gets approved quickly while those
remaining P1s gradually tick away... :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42811
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-20 20:21 ---
Java is not release critical. If it doesn't make 4.5.0 it can easily make
4.5.1.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #7 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-20 20:02 ---
Raising priority P4 -> P3 and Cc'ing RM.
I didn't want to ask to block the release for a bug in a long-neglected
language on a secondary target before I was sure I'd be able to come up with a
fix in time, but now that
--- Comment #6 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-27 17:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=19977)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19977&action=view)
Alternative approach
This alternative approach attempts to place a circular dependency between the
two generated
--- Comment #5 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-20 00:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=19928)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19928&action=view)
patch respin
So, after much single-stepping in the debugger, and some discussion on the
mailing list:
http://gcc
--- Comment #4 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-05 17:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=19808)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19808&action=view)
proposed fix
I'm going to bootstrap and test this patch, which adds a dummy static
dependency to pull in the nonc
--- Comment #3 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-04 03:37 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created an attachment (id=19671)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19671&action=view) [edit]
> patch
>
> now it summons gcj-noncore dll and resolves classes which should ha
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42811
--- Comment #2 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-21 04:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=19671)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19671&action=view)
patch
now it summons gcj-noncore dll and resolves classes which should have been
resolved. i know it's not perfect.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42811
--- Comment #1 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-20 05:02 ---
linking executables with -Wl,--whole-archive libgcj-noncore.la libgcj.la
-Wl,--no-whole-archive solves this problem. excepts that it creates fatty
import symbol table approx. (28 megabyte). is there any workaround instead
11 matches
Mail list logo
