------- Comment #3 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-04 03:37 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created an attachment (id=19671)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19671&action=view) [edit]
> patch
>
> now it summons gcj-noncore dll and resolves classes which should have been
> resolved. i know it's not perfect. so i need your revision.
Thanks for this analysis, I think you're right, the classes provided in the
noncore dll need to be present and there aren't always linker dependencies to
bring them in. I'll try and figure a way to do it automatically using static
dependencies.
--
davek at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |davek at gcc dot gnu dot org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |davek at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-02-04 03:37:59
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42811
