https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039
--- Comment #8 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Wed Apr 13 15:04:57 2016
New Revision: 234946
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234946&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-04-13 Dominique d'Humieres
PR fortran/67039
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I am planning to submit the following patch
--- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.texi2016-01-04 19:51:09.0
+0100
+++ gcc/fortran/intrinsic.texi 2016-04-06 17:15:01.0 +0200
@@ -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4)
> > > Resolved as WONTFIX?
> >
> > Probably not. See the last 2 paragraphs in comment #1.
>
> Sorry, but my question was motivated by the reading
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > Resolved as WONTFIX?
>
> Probably not. See the last 2 paragraphs in comment #1.
Sorry, but my question was motivated by the reading of these two paragraphs!-(
Thus two more explicit questions:
(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> Resolved as WONTFIX?
Probably not. See the last 2 paragraphs in comment #1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
