https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4) > > > Resolved as WONTFIX? > > > > Probably not. See the last 2 paragraphs in comment #1. > > Sorry, but my question was motivated by the reading of these two > paragraphs!-( > Thus two more explicit questions: > > (1) Shall I submit a patch to replace in the manual all the "Fortran 95 and > later" with "Fortran 90 and later" where appropriate? No. gfortran never tried to address the Fortran 90 standard. Whatever is stated in F90 is irrelevant to the extent that gfortran is a Fortran 95 compiler and F90 beget F95. > > (2) Shall I submit a patch to replace > > The Fortran 2003 standard specifies the intrinsic RANDOM_SEED to initialize > the pseudo-random numbers generator and RANDOM_NUMBER to generate > pseudo-random numbers. > > with > > The Fortran 9? standard specifies the intrinsic RANDOM_SEED to initialize > the pseudo-random numbers generator and RANDOM_NUMBER to generate > pseudo-random numbers. These intrinsics should be used in new codes. > I would not not call out a particular standard version. Probably something like The Fortran standard specifies the intrinsic subroutine RANDOM_SEED to initialize the pseudo-random numbers generator and the intrinsic subroutine RANDOM_NUMBER to generate pseudo-random numbers. These subroutines should be used in new codes.
