http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50556
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50556
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 17:37:40 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk. Thanks for the bug reports.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50556
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 17:32:15 UTC ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Jan 21 17:32:12 2012
New Revision: 183370
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183370
Log:
2012-01-21 Tobias Burnus
Steven
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50556
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl
2011-10-29 16:51:10 UTC ---
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 03:17:19PM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> >From c.l.f:
> > Unfortunately, I also found that gfortran has interpreted something like
> > namelist /
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50556
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl
2011-10-29 16:49:38 UTC ---
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 02:47:52PM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > One might argue that a "SAVE namelist-group-name" should mean that all
> > namelist-group-objects associate
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50556
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-29
15:17:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Well, I see in the standard:
[Fortran 2008]
> "C553 An entity with the SAVE attribute shall be a common block, variable,
> or
> procedure pointer."
>
> A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50556
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50556
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
