http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50556
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> 2011-10-29 16:51:10 UTC --- On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 03:17:19PM +0000, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > >From c.l.f: > > Unfortunately, I also found that gfortran has interpreted something like > > namelist /cmd/ i, j, k > > save cmd > > to mean > > namelist /cmd/ i, j, k > > save i, j, k > > The question is whether one needs to allow it. > > g95 and gfortran allow the code > ifort, NAG f95, g77 (!), pathf95/openf95/crayftn reject it. > PGI warns "Symbol, i, appears illegally in a SAVE statement" > > Thus, I wouldn't mind breaking the backward compatibility. I vote that gfortran should follow the majority and simply issue an error.
