http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023
--- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-17 15:59:37 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Oct 17 15:59:32 2011
New Revision: 180099
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180099
Log:
2011-10-17 Janus Weil
PR fortran/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023
--- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-17 09:46:33 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Oct 17 09:46:30 2011
New Revision: 180079
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180079
Log:
2011-10-17 Janus Weil
PR fortran/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-16 19:42:50 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Sun Oct 16 19:42:48 2011
New Revision: 180062
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180062
Log:
2011-10-16 Janus Weil
PR fortran/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2011-09-29
15:49:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> This patch itself doesn't do anything wrong AFAICS, it rather seems to expose
> an underlying bug: Either we need to set the 'is_c_interop' flag correctly or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |---
--- Comment #8 from janus a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2011-09-29
13:17:46 UTC ---
"Argument. X shall be an interoperable data entity that is not an assumed-size
array."
It might be sufficient to test -- besides the obvious stuff (cf. SIZEOF) --
just for derived typ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2011-09-29
13:01:49 UTC ---
Seemingly caused by the patch for PR 44649:
2010-07-08 Janus Weil
PR fortran/44649
* check.c (gfc_check_c_sizeof,gfc_check_storage_size): New functions.
The problem seems
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-09-20
15:35:00 UTC ---
r158253 is OK
r162456 gives the error.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-20 14:57:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > I'm seeing this bug even for an explicitly interoperable type (hence I'm not
> > sure if this is really the same bug -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
K
12 matches
Mail list logo
