http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2011-10-16
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |janus at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-16 08:43:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> > This patch itself doesn't do anything wrong AFAICS, it rather seems to
> > expose
> > an underlying bug: Either we need to set the 'is_c_interop' flag correctly
> > or
> > loosen the checks in verify_c_interop.
>
> I think the latter. I think one can allow all intrinsic types.
On second thought, I'm not so sure about this. Is this actually allowed by the
Fortran standard? (If not, one could think about allowing it only with
--std=gnu as an extension.)
> Note, additionally, that setting attr.is_c_interop is kind of difficult for
> 0.0_c_int ...
Well, no. We don't need to set 'attr.is_c_interop', but 'ts.is_c_interop',
which can also be done for constants. I'm right now testing a patch which does
so and fixes the regression.
