[Bug fortran/36495] libgfortran should be build with FCFLAGS -fimplicit-none

2008-06-13 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-13 07:43 --- FIXED on the trunk (4.4.0). (For building also the C part of libgfortran with -Werror, see PR36518; the .f90f.in file in libgomp has now also "implicit none" [Rev. 136703]; however, "-fimplict-none" is not used in li

[Bug fortran/36495] libgfortran should be build with FCFLAGS -fimplicit-none

2008-06-13 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-13 07:11 --- Subject: Bug 36495 Author: burnus Date: Fri Jun 13 07:10:15 2008 New Revision: 136740 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=136740 Log: 2008-06-13 Tobias Burnus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortr

[Bug fortran/36495] libgfortran should be build with FCFLAGS -fimplicit-none

2008-06-12 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-12 18:16 --- (In reply to comment #0) > As PR 36471 shows, building libgfortran's Fortran parts with -fimplicit-none > can help detecting programming errors in the Fortran written parts of > libgfortran. > > I suggest to use suc

[Bug fortran/36495] libgfortran should be build with FCFLAGS -fimplicit-none

2008-06-12 Thread linuxl4 at sohu dot com
--- Comment #1 from linuxl4 at sohu dot com 2008-06-12 12:50 --- definitely should. a simple wrong typing can lead to an error even without compiler's warning. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36495