--- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 18:02
---
Patch committed, fixed on mainline.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-30 00:55 ---
notice the 6 minutes between the above posts :)
jerry was correct, it needed a NULL check.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35940
--- Comment #5 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-30 00:54 ---
close. here is a better patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-04/msg00278.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35940
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-30 00:00
---
Note the last line of patch is checking for b != NULL before using it.
Probably want to do likewise for the added test condition above.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35940
--- Comment #3 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-29 19:23 ---
this looks promising:
Index: gcc/gcc/fortran/simplify.c
===
--- gcc/gcc/fortran/simplify.c (revision 134801)
+++ gcc/gcc/fortran/simplify.c (working c
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfi
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-16 18:09 ---
Confirmed, not a regression.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com 2008-04-14 21:49
---
I forgot to include the output
C:\gfortran>gfortran fa1031.f
C:\gfortran>a
T F T F T F T F T F
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1
4
--
dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com changed:
