------- Comment #6 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-30 00:55 ------- notice the 6 minutes between the above posts :) jerry was correct, it needed a NULL check.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35940
[Bug fortran/35940] Array BACK ignored in INDEX intrinsic when other args scalar
bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:56:23 -0700
- [Bug fortran/35940] New: Array BACK... dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com
- [Bug fortran/35940] Array BACK ... dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com
- [Bug fortran/35940] Array BACK ... tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/35940] Array BACK ... tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/35940] Array BACK ... bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/35940] Array BACK ... jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/35940] Array BACK ... bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/35940] Array BACK ... bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/35940] Array BACK ... fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
