--- Comment #25 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-27 01:08
---
Memory leaks are now gone. Not sure why, but no complaints here
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #24 from george at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-26 10:18 ---
ICE/segfault on test case eliminated by rev. 134696.
Memory leaks unrelated to original patch still unresolved.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35892
--- Comment #23 from george at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-26 09:46 ---
Subject: Bug 35892
Author: george
Date: Sat Apr 26 09:46:01 2008
New Revision: 134696
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=134696
Log:
2008-04-26 George Helffrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR f
--- Comment #22 from KnowlesPJ at Cardiff dot ac dot uk 2008-04-25 08:10
---
Yes, this was the silver bullet. With
Using built-in specs.
Target: i386-apple-darwin9.2.2
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/opt/gcc
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.4.0 20080424 (experimental) (GCC)
--- Comment #21 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-24 19:10
---
Reply to comment #18. I have not had time to dig further on these memory
issues. I think after George has a revamped patch in, I will explore some more
on this. We are probably just not freeing some memory aft
--- Comment #20 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-24 19:05
---
The part that was causing the crash has been reverted. Can you try with
current latest trunk version 4.4.0 and see if it really is the silver bullet?
and report back here.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #19 from KnowlesPJ at Cardiff dot ac dot uk 2008-04-24 09:34
---
As the originator of this report, I just wanted to add a context comment in
case it is helpful. This construction (common declared both in the module and
in subroutines (contained or external)) is horrible, but
--- Comment #18 from george at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-24 08:29 ---
I've investigated the PR code further. The relevant parts of the code are
structured like so:
module mod
integer aa, bb
common /oof/ aa,bb
contains
subroutine sub
i = max(0,aa-1)
print *, i, aa, bb
end
--- Comment #17 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-19 21:12
---
I am reopening this PR. In my further attempts to reduce the test case here to
help with the "apparent" problem with PR35154 I have discovered two things:
1. The test case can only be reduced slightly before th
