------- Comment #21 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-24 19:10 ------- Reply to comment #18. I have not had time to dig further on these memory issues. I think after George has a revamped patch in, I will explore some more on this. We are probably just not freeing some memory after it is used. (I hope)
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35892