--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 08:50 ---
Subject: Bug 35824
Author: pault
Date: Sun Nov 30 08:48:51 2008
New Revision: 142292
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142292
Log:
2008-11-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 08:04 ---
This is fixed for trunk and 4.3.
I have prepared a testcase that will be committed tonight.
Thanks for the report.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-18 16:00 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
The patch that I have been working on, which is held up by memory leak
problems, actually cures this fellow too.
I am active again on all the allocatable component bugs.
Watch this space.
Pa
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-18 15:37 ---
> I have to admit, I did not quickly see in the dump (-fdump-tree-original) why
> it is failing; at a glance, both calling "neg_at" in MAIN__ and the assignment
> in "neg_at" itself look ok; and "t2 = -t1" also works.
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-04 14:14 ---
> Confirmed on powerpc-apple-darwin9 (but not on i686-apple-darwin9). The bus
> error comes from the statement 'b%b=-a%b' in function 'neg_at'. If I insert
> 'print *, allocated(a%b)' in the function, I get .false. on
--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-04-04 10:09 ---
Confirmed on powerpc-apple-darwin9 (but not on i686-apple-darwin9). The bus
error comes from the statement 'b%b=-a%b' in function 'neg_at'. If I insert
'print *, allocated(a%b)' in the function, I get .false. on power
