------- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-04 14:14 -------
> Confirmed on powerpc-apple-darwin9 (but not on i686-apple-darwin9). The bus
> error comes from the statement 'b%b=-a%b' in function 'neg_at'. If I insert
> 'print *, allocated(a%b)' in the function, I get .false. on powerpc (but
> .true.
> for i686) for 't1=-t1'.
Also confirmed on x86-64-linux. I always get non allocated before and allocated
after the allocation statement, which looks OK.
I have to admit, I did not quickly see in the dump (-fdump-tree-original) why
it is failing; at a glance, both calling "neg_at" in MAIN__ and the assignment
in "neg_at" itself look ok; and "t2 = -t1" also works.
Side question: Why do we initialize b.b.data with NULL 3 times?
b.b.data = 0B;
b.b.data = 0B;
{
struct alltype alltype.0;
alltype.0.b.data = 0B;
b = alltype.0;
}
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywords| |wrong-code
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-04-04 14:14:38
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35824
