--- Comment #16 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-23 20:53 ---
Fixed in 4.2 and the trunk.
Allocatable components are not in 4.1 and thus this bug fix cannot be ported to
4.1.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #14 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 09:55 ---
Subject: Bug 30793
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Feb 16 09:55:20 2007
New Revision: 122037
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122037
Log:
fortran/
2007-02-16 Tobias Burnus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #13 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2007-02-16 09:40 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> For both test cases, xlf gives:
>
> ** class_mesh === End of Compilation 1 ===
> ** class_field === End of Compilation 2 ===
> .
> (second test case). I don't know if they are rig
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #12 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-02-15 17:25 ---
Subject: Bug number PR30793
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg01366.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #11 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2007-02-15 10:42 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> > > I have still to re-read the test case to check whether TARGET is required
> >
> > However the accessed component is a POINTER to a derived type [...]
>
> Ok, I somehow didn't realiz
--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 10:32 ---
> > I have still to re-read the test case to check whether TARGET is required
>
> However the accessed component is a POINTER to a derived type [...]
Ok, I somehow didn't realize
type field
type(mesh),
--- Comment #9 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2007-02-15 09:55 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> The link to c.l.fortran is:
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/23aa68ecce460e50
>
> Richard Main: "The pointer assignment is ok. I [...] don't have
> ti
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 09:45 ---
The link to c.l.fortran is:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/23aa68ecce460e50
Richard Main: "The pointer assignment is ok. I [...] don't have
time to adequately peruse the rest of
--- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-02-14 21:54 ---
The following changes
--- pr30793.f90 Wed Feb 14 19:50:03 2007
+++ pr30793_red.f90 Wed Feb 14 22:50:04 2007
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
end type field
interface msh_
-module procedure msh_
+module procedure
--- Comment #6 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2007-02-14 21:18 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> ...
> My understanding of f90 and above is not sufficient to say if the test cases
> are valid or not.
> From what I ahve read in different list ifort seems very tolerant, at lea
--- Comment #5 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-02-14 21:00 ---
On AMD64, gfortran x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, 4.3.0 20061231, gives:
pr30793_1.f90:44.24:
use class_scalar_field
1
Error: Name 'msh_' at (1) is an ambiguous reference to 'msh_' from module
'c
--- Comment #4 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2007-02-14 20:35 ---
I fail to see how xlf's output can be correct on the first error; fld%msh is a
POINTER component. ANd get_scalar_field_msh is set. So there must be something
else going on. Intel fortran 9.1 digests it without a glit
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-02-14 19:00 ---
For both test cases, xlf gives:
** class_mesh === End of Compilation 1 ===
** class_field === End of Compilation 2 ===
"pr30793.f90", line 127.5: 1515-039 (S) The target in the pointer assignment
must have the TA
--- Comment #2 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2007-02-14 18:10 ---
Created an attachment (id=13050)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13050&action=view)
test case
This has been reduced by Tobias Burnus; I am not sure it is the same because of
the PRIVATE attributes
--- Comment #1 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2007-02-14 18:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=13049)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13049&action=view)
Test case
Test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30793
16 matches
Mail list logo
