------- Comment #13 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2007-02-16 09:40 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> For both test cases, xlf gives:
>
> ** class_mesh === End of Compilation 1 ===
> ** class_field === End of Compilation 2 ===
> .....
> (second test case). I don't know if they are right, but the errors may give a
> clue.
>
Must be a bug in that version, because on an AIX SP with XLF 10 I get a clean
compile
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] /data/ado/sfilippo>xlf95 -o test_pnt test_pnt.f90
** class_mesh === End of Compilation 1 ===
** class_field === End of Compilation 2 ===
** class_scalar_field === End of Compilation 3 ===
** test_pnt === End of Compilation 4 ===
1501-510 Compilation successful for file test_pnt.f90.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] /data/ado/sfilippo>./test_pnt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] /data/ado/sfilippo>lslpp -h xlfcmp
Fileset Level Action Status Date Time
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Path: /usr/lib/objrepos
xlfcmp
10.1.0.0 COMMIT COMPLETE 07/10/06 10:23:41
10.1.0.1 COMMIT COMPLETE 07/10/06 10:26:42
10.1.0.2 COMMIT COMPLETE 01/12/07 18:53:02
Path: /etc/objrepos
xlfcmp
10.1.0.0 COMMIT COMPLETE 07/10/06 10:23:52
10.1.0.1 COMMIT COMPLETE 07/10/06 10:26:42
10.1.0.2 COMMIT COMPLETE 01/12/07 18:53:02
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30793
