[Bug fortran/29317] gfortran.dg/exponent_1.f90 failure

2006-10-03 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 16:17 --- (In reply to comment #5) > The gfortran.dg/exponent_1.f90 and gfortran.dg/nearest_1.f90 are falling > on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11. I updated to mpfr 2.2.0 and the tests are still > failing. Possibly, I need a compl

[Bug fortran/29317] gfortran.dg/exponent_1.f90 failure

2006-10-02 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
--- Comment #7 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2006-10-03 02:27 --- Subject: Re: gfortran.dg/exponent_1.f90 failure On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 02:12:55AM -, danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > The gfortran.dg/exponent_1.f90 and gfortran.dg/nearest_1.f90 ar

[Bug fortran/29317] gfortran.dg/exponent_1.f90 failure

2006-10-02 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 02:17 --- Yes, make sure you do a complete clean rebuild. You may also need this for the PR29327. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29317

[Bug fortran/29317] gfortran.dg/exponent_1.f90 failure

2006-10-02 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 02:12 --- The gfortran.dg/exponent_1.f90 and gfortran.dg/nearest_1.f90 are falling on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11. I updated to mpfr 2.2.0 and the tests are still failing. Possibly, I need a complete rebuild. -- danglin at gcc

[Bug fortran/29317] gfortran.dg/exponent_1.f90 failure

2006-10-02 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
--- Comment #4 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2006-10-02 19:08 --- Subject: Re: New: gfortran.dg/exponent_1.f90 failure On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 09:32:55AM -, fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > gfortran.dg/exponent_1.f90 is failing at all optimization

[Bug fortran/29317] gfortran.dg/exponent_1.f90 failure

2006-10-02 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
--- Comment #3 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2006-10-02 15:00 --- Subject: Re: gfortran.dg/exponent_1.f90 failure On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 02:27:47PM -, Francois-Xavier dot Coudert at ens dot fr wrote: > > > --- Comment #2 from Francois-Xavier dot Coude

[Bug fortran/29317] gfortran.dg/exponent_1.f90 failure

2006-10-02 Thread Francois-Xavier dot Coudert at ens dot fr
--- Comment #2 from Francois-Xavier dot Coudert at ens dot fr 2006-10-02 14:27 --- Subject: Re: gfortran.dg/exponent_1.f90 failure > If you have a good mpfr, then the problem may be similar to the one > with nearest_1.f90 where the extra precision in the registers is bad > (ie., add -

[Bug fortran/29317] gfortran.dg/exponent_1.f90 failure

2006-10-02 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
--- Comment #1 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2006-10-02 14:22 --- Subject: Re: New: gfortran.dg/exponent_1.f90 failure On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 09:32:55AM -, fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > gfortran.dg/exponent_1.f90 is failing at all optimization