--- Comment #29 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 06:20
---
> Here's the selected_int_kind.inc file generated on Solaris 8 with gcc 4.0.3.
Thanks. Victory, at last something obviously broken. :-) The file reads:
integer, parameter :: c = 0
type (int_info), paramet
--- Comment #28 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-29 22:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=11160)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11160&action=view)
selected_int_kind.inc
Here's the selected_int_kind.inc file generated on Solaris 8 with gcc 4.0.3.
--
http://
--- Comment #27 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-29 01:47 ---
I'll try the flags and get the attachment to you tomorrow. Today is my
birthday, and my wife doesn't really want me on the computer much. ;)
So far, gcc 4.1.0 looks to be building without issue.
--
http://gcc.gnu
--- Comment #26 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-28 21:07
---
> Except that it is generated on the fly by mk-sic-ink.sh...
Sorry, I was talking about selected_int_kind.inc... Could you attach this one?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26889
--- Comment #25 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-28 21:03
---
> selected_int_kind.f90 (it is just what is shipped with the gcc-4.0.3
> source...)
Except that it is generated on the fly by mk-sic-ink.sh...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26889
--- Comment #24 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-28 20:59 ---
I will look at removing the libintl/libiconv bits, but in the past gcc failed
to find them without adding those flags.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26889
--- Comment #23 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-28 20:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=11144)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11144&action=view)
selected_int_kind.f90
selected_int_kind.f90 (it is just what is shipped with the gcc-4.0.3 source...)
--
http
--- Comment #22 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-28 20:56 ---
I can look at only building GMP static, rather than static & shared.
I have a build of 4.1 happening on Solaris 9 at the moment after fixing the ksh
issue.
--Quanah
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
--- Comment #21 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-28 20:41
---
> /afs/ir.stanford.edu/src/pubsw/languages/gcc-build/sun4x_58/gcc/gfortran
> -B/afs/ir.stanford.edu/src/pubsw/languages/gcc-build/sun4x_58/gcc/
> -B/usr/pubsw/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/bin/ -B/usr/pubsw/sparc-sun-sola
--- Comment #20 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-28 20:31
---
> Unsuprisingly,the build still fails after changing it to use "make boostrap"
> in the same exact way:
Maybe "unsurprisingly", but this eliminates a whole category of problems.
Could you remove --with-libintl-
--- Comment #19 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-28 20:18 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> Unsuprisingly,the build still fails after changing it to
> use "make boostrap" in the same exact way:
>
> ../../../../gcc-4.0.3/libgfortran/intrinsics/selected_int_kind.f90 -fPIC
I've sc
--- Comment #18 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-28 19:23 ---
Unsuprisingly,the build still fails after changing it to use "make boostrap" in
the same exact way:
/afs/ir.stanford.edu/src/pubsw/languages/gcc-build/sun4x_58/gcc/gfortran
-B/afs/ir.stanford.edu/src/pubsw/languages/gc
--- Comment #17 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-28 07:46
---
> "make" worked fine with gcc-3.4.x, gcc-3.3.x, gcc-2.9x etc.
Yes, but it's wrong up to (and including) 4.1.x. We only guarantee that the
compiler correctly compiles itself ("bootstraps"), not that it is correc
--- Comment #16 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-28 07:33 ---
I will try "make bootstrap", but I note:
"make" worked fine with gcc-3.4.x, gcc-3.3.x, gcc-2.9x etc.
And for i386 and amd64 it worked just fine, too, for gcc 4.0.3 with these same
versions of GMP and MPFR to build for
--- Comment #15 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-28 07:28
---
> For building GCC, I execute:
>
> cd ../gcc-build/@sys && make CFLAGS='-O' \
> LIBCFLAGS='-g -O2' LIBCXXFLAGS='-g -O2 -fno-implicit-templates' 2>&1 | tee
> -a makeLOG
Use 'make bootstrap' instead of 'make'
--- Comment #14 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-28 07:26 ---
For building GCC, I execute:
cd ../gcc-build/@sys && make CFLAGS='-O' \
LIBCFLAGS='-g -O2' LIBCXXFLAGS='-g -O2 -fno-implicit-templates' 2>&1 | tee
-a makeLOG
(@sys is an AFS thing, it translates to sun4x_58 or s
--- Comment #13 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-28 07:24
---
And the command line for the compiler?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26889
--- Comment #12 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-28 07:21 ---
For GMP (4.1.4 and 4.2, I've tried both versions):
This file contains any messages produced by compilers while
running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake.
It was created by configure, which was
g
--- Comment #11 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-28 06:33
---
> I rebuilt gmp with:
>
> --build=sparc-sun-solaris2.8
>
> and then rebuilt MPFR, and then rebuilt gcc 4.0.3. On Solaris 8, it is still
> dying, with:
Please post the exact configure line and command line
--- Comment #10 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-28 01:59 ---
I rebuilt gmp with:
--build=sparc-sun-solaris2.8
and then rebuilt MPFR, and then rebuilt gcc 4.0.3. On Solaris 8, it is still
dying, with:
/afs/ir.stanford.edu/src/pubsw/languages/gcc-build/sun4x_58/gcc/gfortran
--- Comment #9 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-27 22:32
---
> I'll note that GMP was built with ABI=32 in my case.
I'd recommend to configure it as specified in the instructions:
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc-sun-solaris2
And you also need to make sure
--- Comment #8 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-27 22:27 ---
sorry, I meant 4.1.0, and you answered that well enough. ;)
*how* do I build gmp/mpfr without TLS? I don't see any configure options that
make sense for this...
I'll note that GMP was built with ABI=32 in my case.
--
--- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-27 22:19
---
> I didn't build gcc 4.0.2 with Fortran support because I needed to build gcc to
> build GMP and MPFR. ;)
Of course. :-) I just rebuild 4.0.3 with 4.0.2 on SPARC/Solaris 8:
gax% CC=gcc40 /home/eric/svn/gcc-4_0-
--- Comment #6 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-27 22:09 ---
I don't see a way to disable "TLS" support in GMP or MPFR, but I'll keep
poking.
I didn't build gcc 4.0.2 with Fortran support because I needed to build gcc to
build GMP and MPFR. ;)
Building gcc 4.0.1 also fails for m
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-27 21:00
---
> Disable TLS support in *which* library?
GMP/MPFR.
> There are no options in the configure for GMP or MPFR referring to TLS/SSL.
Did you build gcc-4.0.2 with Fortran support? If so, could you try building
4.0
--- Comment #4 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-27 20:48 ---
Disable TLS support in *which* library?
GMP, MPFR, or libfortran?
There are no options in the configure for GMP or MPFR referring to TLS/SSL.
--Quanah
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26889
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-27 20:15
---
Very likely a GMP/MFPR problem, try to disable TLS support in the library.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #2 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-27 19:23 ---
On Solaris 8, the build fails also, except with the following error:
/afs/ir.stanford.edu/src/pubsw/languages/gcc-build/sun4x_58/gcc/gfortran
-B/afs/ir.stanford.edu/src/pubsw/languages/gcc-build/sun4x_58/gcc/
-B/usr/pub
--- Comment #1 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-27 17:23 ---
change to fortran, instead of libfortran.
--
quanah at stanford dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
29 matches
Mail list logo
