--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-07 14:18 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Although I don't understand your comment in PR20441 about -finit-local-zero
> being only useful for old codes.
Because From what I remember whne I filed the bug, it was mentioned that it
s
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-07 12:48
---
Yes, it's a duplicate of 20441 (which I didn't know about).
Although I don't understand your comment in PR20441 about -finit-local-zero
being only useful for old codes.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicat
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-07 12:37 ---
Isn't this is a dup of bug 20441?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26150
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last recon
