------- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-07 12:48
-------
Yes, it's a duplicate of 20441 (which I didn't know about).
Although I don't understand your comment in PR20441 about -finit-local-zero
being only useful for old codes.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 20441 ***
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26150
