[Bug fortran/25416] Segmentation fault in gfc_conv_function_call

2006-01-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25416

[Bug fortran/25416] Segmentation fault in gfc_conv_function_call

2006-01-27 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-27 22:24 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.1 Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/25416] Segmentation fault in gfc_conv_function_call

2006-01-27 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-27 22:16 --- Subject: Bug 25416 Author: pault Date: Fri Jan 27 22:16:04 2006 New Revision: 110310 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110310 Log: 2005-01-28 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/25416] Segmentation fault in gfc_conv_function_call

2006-01-27 Thread uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-27 18:43 --- Thanks for fixing this! Any chance of getting the fix into 4.1, or this is too risky? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25416

[Bug fortran/25416] Segmentation fault in gfc_conv_function_call

2006-01-26 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-26 20:19 --- Subject: Bug 25416 Author: pault Date: Thu Jan 26 20:19:09 2006 New Revision: 110269 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110269 Log: 2005-01-26 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/25416] Segmentation fault in gfc_conv_function_call

2006-01-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 18:14 --- *** Bug 25928 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25416

[Bug fortran/25416] Segmentation fault in gfc_conv_function_call

2005-12-14 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 06:18 --- (In reply to comment #3) > I doubt it, this seems to be about gfc_conv_function_call. > Oh, right, your patch replaces gfc_build_function_call and not gfc_conv_function_call. Sorry for the confusion. -- http://gcc.

[Bug fortran/25416] Segmentation fault in gfc_conv_function_call

2005-12-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-14 20:34 --- I doubt it, this seems to be about gfc_conv_function_call. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25416

[Bug fortran/25416] Segmentation fault in gfc_conv_function_call

2005-12-14 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-14 18:40 --- Richard Guenther made a patch to get rid of gfc_conv_function_call and replace all usage of it with build_function_call_expr: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-12/msg00235.html . If we're lucky that patch might fix this

[Bug fortran/25416] Segmentation fault in gfc_conv_function_call

2005-12-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-14 18:14 --- Confirmed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCON