------- Comment #4 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 06:18 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I doubt it, this seems to be about gfc_conv_function_call. >
Oh, right, your patch replaces gfc_build_function_call and not gfc_conv_function_call. Sorry for the confusion. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25416
