--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-21 11:57 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Hello Paul,
>
> I think the patch you committed to 4.5 causes a regression for normal
> loops, which are now handled as overlapping.
Thomas,
I did not commit anything but I tried it out.
--- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-15 20:41 ---
Hello Paul,
I think the patch you committed to 4.5 causes a regression for normal
loops, which are now handled as overlapping.
I think I fixed that in
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=162829
on t
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 14:26 ---
Subject: Bug 24524
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jul 23 14:25:55 2010
New Revision: 162462
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162462
Log:
2009-07-23 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/24524
* tra
--- Comment #4 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-07-09 12:11 ---
> This version fixes the problem with channel.f90 and has cleaned-up/extra
> comments
The patch in comment #3 fixes the problems with channel.f90, regstrapped and
passed my tests.
I have also checked that gfortran be
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-06 15:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=21113)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21113&action=view)
Fix for the PR
This version fixes the problem with channel.f90 and has cleaned-up/extra
comments
--
http://g
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-01 19:37 ---
Updated patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-06/msg00181.html
(was broken because of now fixed PR 44592)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24524
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-15 10:14 ---
I posted a prototype fix for this a few months ago:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-10/msg00173.html and subsequent thread.
It will not take much to complete and correct it but I do not have overmuch
time right now
--
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status|UNCONFIRMED
