--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24276
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-27 22:34 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-27 22:16 ---
Subject: Bug 24276
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jan 27 22:16:04 2006
New Revision: 110310
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110310
Log:
2005-01-28 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #3 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-01-10 05:16 ---
Subject: Re: Components of a derived type array not passed
as an array
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-09 23:24
>---
>the parse tree is c
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-09 23:24 ---
the parse tree is correct:
CALL foo ((MAIN__:list(FULL) % word))
So this is just a trans issue as far as I can tell.
Also it is even worse with, were we print way wrong stuff:
program test_lex
type :: dtype
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 17:32 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
