------- Comment #3 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-01-10 05:16 ------- Subject: Re: Components of a derived type array not passed as an array
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: >------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-09 23:24 >------- >the parse tree is correct: > CALL foo ((MAIN__:list(FULL) % word)) > >So this is just a trans issue as far as I can tell. > > Yes it is. Since we do not have aliassed descriptors and size is not in bytes, the offset and the step size cannot be transmitted, in general. I have a patch most of the way ready that transfers a temporary to procedure and copies it back again to the derived type upon return. I have wrinkle to sort out, which is that the temporary descriptor is zero based and my code is not picking that up. The result is that the elements get shifted down one place. I was doing this, when I got distracted by the global references and plan to return to it asap. Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24276
